It's a question that Romney supporters are fond of throwing around smugly, one of those supposedly undeniable truth statements that are supposed to stop you in your tracks because there is no way to answer it without admitting that the person asking is correct in their assumptions. In this case, the assumption is that Obama hasn't made anything better in America. It's a weird about-face, as it is usually the incumbent asking the question as way of underlining how good they've been at their job.
Since we are only days away from the 2012 Presidential Elections, I'm feeling rather motivated to actually answer this question. The last four years haven't been especially easy for anybody not in the top 10% (you know, the people who own the country, it seems), but I think it's fair to answer the question on an individual bases, considering that the question is meant to motivate my individual vote.
Anyway, comparing November 2008 with November 2012, am I better off now than I was four years ago?
Four years ago, I was:
*Laid off after fifteen years with the same company, because the sudden economic downturn crippled the entire industry in a matter of months.
*Subsequently laid up with the Swine Flu for a month (Happy Holidays!) with no medical insurance.
*Suddenly stuck with not being able to afford classes after having started attending college night classes again the previous year.
*Living in a house suddenly worth $30,000 less than it was two years ago.
Today, I am:
*Working for a new small business owner that isn't squeamish about hiring new employees during an Obama presidency, despite all Right Wing claims to the contrary.
*Still in possession of my house, thanks in part to extended federal unemployment benefits that helped me to stay afloat for the year and a half I was unemployed, and helped me stay financially intact enough so that I was prepared to survive the year and a half I was forced to work for an exploitative business owner who denied his employees federally-protected overtime pay and made Labor Day a non-payed holiday.
*One class away from obtaining my degree, thanks to Obama's improvements to the Pell Grant system, including allowing Unemployment benefits to be disregarded when calculating Pell Grant eligibility.
*Living in a state that was ravaged by a hurricane (ironically sharing the name of the employer that laid me off four years ago), and seeing my state survive and recover from the disaster with the help of immediately received support from FEMA, the organization that Romney has gleefully contemplated defunding in past interviews.
Is everything 100% better or back to normal four years later? Of course not. I'm still without medical insurance, and the medical insurance I will be eligible for soon will undoubtedly cost me more than it did when I last had it. Also, I love my new job, but I'm still not close to restoring my financial situation to what it once was, and real estate values still haven't recovered enough for my mortgage lose its underwater status.
But am I better off than I was four years ago, unemployed at the beginning of the worst recession since the Great Depression, licked to the curb by my career occupation at a time in which College Graduates and Six-Figure-Salary professionals were already begging for entry-level positions, sick with an as-of-yet undiagnosed pig disease as I watched Obama being sworn into office?
You bet your ass I am.
A Podcast about the growing incomprehensible nature of the world around us, and how nothing seems to be as it should. From Politics to Pop Culture, hosts Scott and Joey openly discuss a variety of topics that promise to encourage lively debate, bizarre insights, and increased misanthropic tendencies.
Friday, November 2, 2012
Thursday, November 1, 2012
The REAL Reason Behind Romney's Fake Donation Drive
In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, most political junkies are no doubt being bombarded with the videos of Romney putting on his Emergency Donation Drive while ignoring repeated questions shouted out to him regarding his feelings towards FEMA. Having called FEMA both "immoral" and "an abomination" (or is that 'Obamination'?), reporters were obviously eager to see what he had to say about the relief organization as it was currently attending to needy hurricane victims up and down the East Coast. If you missed it, here it is again. Try not to giggle too much.
Other info regarding this shameful exploitation photo-op has been so numerous, it's hard to pick a favorite. Whether it's the campaign purchasing supplies and displaying them as donated goods in case donation turnout was low, people only being allowed to greet Romney if they had donations to give him while shaking his hand (to the point of allowing some to hand over already donated items as they met him), only directing donated good to swing states on the East Coast, or the fact that both The Red Cross and FEMA both specifically state on their sites that donated goods are far less effective to them than cash donations, there's definitely something for everybody to harp on.
What's missing, however, is what this photo-op was meant to do in the first place. Of course, the fact that it failed so miserably means that we will never hear the message that was meant to follow the performance of this ill-conceived Saturday Afternoon Special. However, sometimes the intention is just as important as the result, so it's a little disheartening that most of the news outlets are dropping the ball on this one.
Whenever "Small Government" Republicans rally against the evils of government spending to help society's needy, they always double-back and cover their Christian Idealism tracks with the claim that charity is of course a good thing, but that this Charity should come from the churches and community, not inefficient government programs. Romney's display of community charity flopped while those inefficient government programs were saving lives and assisting in recovering from the wreckage, so they'll never get a chance to use this as the selling point that they hoped it would be, but this photo-op was not meant as a promotional for Team Romney's Disaster Relief as much as it was supposed to be a clear demonstration of how mobilized community charity can fill the shoes of organizations like FEMA.
The lesson learned from this sad demonstration is just as damaging as the teenage birth rates from states with abstinence-only sex education. Community and religious organized charity (which the Republicans always assume are one in the same, by the way) are welcomes and needed, but lack the ability to match even a fraction of the ability our government has to mobilize rescue and relief crews during a national emergency, weather related or otherwise. This, and it scares me that I need to actually spell this out for some people, is what our government is supposed to do; protect its citizens from threats both foreign and domestic. The Right was so successful in selling the Terrorism threat as the new Red Scare that they've managed to convince a lot of people that the domestic part of that protection only refers to crime and terrorism, and not the other disasters that can befall this countries people.
It is under this confusion of what the government is meant to protect us from that the Republicans try to convince us that FEMA, welfare, healthcare, firefighters, law enforcement, and a host of other programs meant to protect American citizens from tragedy and despair are not actually the job of the government, but of the citizens themselves. Or more specifically, the corporations that will eagerly privatize these organizations the moment Republicans open the door for them. because when you're faced with a disaster and need rescuing or support, what you really want is a for-profit organization deciding whether or not saving you is beneficial to their fiscal budget. Which, coincidentally, is what Republicans like Romney have been gleefully demanding that the government do; check the pocketbook, and don't respond until you're sure that rescue and relief will come in under budget. Fools rush in, after all.
So yes, Romney's little Donation Drive was a laughing stock. But it's the policies behind the photo-op that we should be laughing at, and loudly enough so everybody hears us.
Other info regarding this shameful exploitation photo-op has been so numerous, it's hard to pick a favorite. Whether it's the campaign purchasing supplies and displaying them as donated goods in case donation turnout was low, people only being allowed to greet Romney if they had donations to give him while shaking his hand (to the point of allowing some to hand over already donated items as they met him), only directing donated good to swing states on the East Coast, or the fact that both The Red Cross and FEMA both specifically state on their sites that donated goods are far less effective to them than cash donations, there's definitely something for everybody to harp on.
What's missing, however, is what this photo-op was meant to do in the first place. Of course, the fact that it failed so miserably means that we will never hear the message that was meant to follow the performance of this ill-conceived Saturday Afternoon Special. However, sometimes the intention is just as important as the result, so it's a little disheartening that most of the news outlets are dropping the ball on this one.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The lesson learned from this sad demonstration is just as damaging as the teenage birth rates from states with abstinence-only sex education. Community and religious organized charity (which the Republicans always assume are one in the same, by the way) are welcomes and needed, but lack the ability to match even a fraction of the ability our government has to mobilize rescue and relief crews during a national emergency, weather related or otherwise. This, and it scares me that I need to actually spell this out for some people, is what our government is supposed to do; protect its citizens from threats both foreign and domestic. The Right was so successful in selling the Terrorism threat as the new Red Scare that they've managed to convince a lot of people that the domestic part of that protection only refers to crime and terrorism, and not the other disasters that can befall this countries people.
It is under this confusion of what the government is meant to protect us from that the Republicans try to convince us that FEMA, welfare, healthcare, firefighters, law enforcement, and a host of other programs meant to protect American citizens from tragedy and despair are not actually the job of the government, but of the citizens themselves. Or more specifically, the corporations that will eagerly privatize these organizations the moment Republicans open the door for them. because when you're faced with a disaster and need rescuing or support, what you really want is a for-profit organization deciding whether or not saving you is beneficial to their fiscal budget. Which, coincidentally, is what Republicans like Romney have been gleefully demanding that the government do; check the pocketbook, and don't respond until you're sure that rescue and relief will come in under budget. Fools rush in, after all.
So yes, Romney's little Donation Drive was a laughing stock. But it's the policies behind the photo-op that we should be laughing at, and loudly enough so everybody hears us.
Related articles
- Get Rid of FEMA? Right-Wingers Push Insane Privatization Scheme in the Wake of Hurricane Sandy
- Watch Mitt Romney Avoid 11 Separate Questions About What He Would Do with FEMA: VIDEO
- Mitchell Bard: One Lesson From Sandy: We Can't Afford to Have a President Who Irrationally Hates Government
- Mitt Romney offers answer on his FEMA stance
- FEMA funding no longer 'immoral' for Romney
- Romney at His Sandy 'Relief' Event Compares Hurricane Recovery to Picking up 'Rubbish and Paper' on Football Field
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Strange Land #16: Presidential Debate Woes
Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
To lighten things up, we end the show by discussing the suicide aired live on Fox News during Shepard Smith's show Fox Report.
Yeah, it's going to be that kind of month.
Related articles
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Strange Land #15: Wake the Fuck Up!
English: Anti-Barack Obama demonstrator at an Obama rally, Springfield, Missouri, on November 1, 2008 (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Then, after a recap of the past week, Scott takes a moment to visit his favorite bat-shit-crazy right-wing political blog, Godfather Politics, the perfect site to visit if you need a quick reminder of how stupid and insane your more popular right-wing positions really are.
Did you know that Obama wants to turn us all into ants? Crazy until you realize it's meant as a metaphor, then stupid as you read the metaphor, then crazy again as realize how irrational the ant colony/socialist agenda analogy is upon even a cursory examination.
This leads to Scott's confession that for three days he actually believed that the Obama birth certificate that White House release was a forgery, proving that even the most rational individual can be temporarily swayed to believe the most ludicrous claims until taking the time to investigate further.
Not to get stuck totally on political junkie talk, Joey ends the show on a more upbeat note by switching gears to some lighthearted TMZ coverage of the Johnny Lewis murder/suicide.
Finally, for your tea-bagging enjoyment, a video explaining why the White House-released Obama Birth Certificate was not a forgery.
Related articles
- Samuel L. Jackson to Voters: "Wake the Fuck Up!"
- Obama The Fakery Continues Indiana Judge Hears Obama Forgery Evidence So What Happened?!
- Evidence Of Forgery In Obama Birth Certificate Admitted At Trial
- Indiana: Obama Removed From Ballot? Birthers Final Chance On Monday 10/22/2012
- Samuel L. Jackson's hilarious Dr. Seuss-inspired Obama ad
- Vid: Wake the F*ck Up! (A Rebuttal)
Friday, July 13, 2012
Strange Land #4: Heads on Spikes
Strangers in a Strange Land Episode #4 is now live and available on iTunes and other podcast hosting sites, or simply click on the above link to download now! Would it be too cocky if we celebrated our Fifth Episode Anniversary next week? That's right, for those of you who kept telling us that you've heard enough of our incessant caterwauling, you were apparently wrong! HA! Eat it, pink boy!
In this episode, you'll hear conversations about the increasingly massive Libor banking scandal (and how we have yet to see one banker's head on a stick), the insanity that is the new political field, the shameless lack of intelligent and rational media coverage involving insane pseudo-politicians, the struggle to find decent auto insurance, how Nancy Grace made a woman set herself on fire, and why joking about shooting the first lady is never a good idea when you are law enforcement officer on White House protection duty. We struggled to keep this one short, but it just seems like there is no end to the madness, and once we get started, it is hard for us to stop. And on that note, for your viewing pleasure, a picture of Nancy Grace's nipple.
In this episode, you'll hear conversations about the increasingly massive Libor banking scandal (and how we have yet to see one banker's head on a stick), the insanity that is the new political field, the shameless lack of intelligent and rational media coverage involving insane pseudo-politicians, the struggle to find decent auto insurance, how Nancy Grace made a woman set herself on fire, and why joking about shooting the first lady is never a good idea when you are law enforcement officer on White House protection duty. We struggled to keep this one short, but it just seems like there is no end to the madness, and once we get started, it is hard for us to stop. And on that note, for your viewing pleasure, a picture of Nancy Grace's nipple.
Related articles
Labels:
CNN,
HLN,
ITunes,
Law Enforcement,
Minnesota,
Nancy Grace,
Podcast,
Vodka,
White House
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Strangers in a Strange Land #1 - Introductions and Consumer Woes
Old Woolworth's lunch counter, now a antiques/junk shop, Magazine Street down from Napoleon Avenue, Uptown New Orleans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
In this first episode of an ongoing series, Robert Anton Wilson's name is dropped as the dumbing down of America the ignorance of retail customers is discussed. Also mentioned is Scott's recent experiences with Verizon's dismal customer service, his past history of teenage rebellion against former employer Woolworth (remember their lunch counters) by eating raw bacon, and other forms of employee retaliation through minor acts of petty theft.
Not enough, how about Planned Obsolescence, Joey's Tech Talk, corporate ignorance of the importance of a sustainable infrastructure to commerce, how much Service Electric sucks, and the importance of a good lead solder.
In the next episode, Scott will take additional time to explain to Joey in detail the literal definition of a Can of Juice.
Related articles
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
And so it begins...
Introductions are probably in order. I'm Scott. This is Joey.
We've been hosting a movie review podcast for over two years now called Moviesucktastic. Noticing one night that we spend an inordinate amount of time discussing bad movies, we decided to start recording these conversation, adding a pinch of production value here and there, and releasing these film-based rants as a podcast series. It's been a lot of fun, and with our 100th episode rounding the corner by the end of this year, we don't plan on stopping anytime soon.
But lately, in between bad movies and late-night recording sessions, a new thought has occurred to us.
We don't just talk about movies.
And so a new podcast is born. With an eye on keeping episode times down to a 30 to 60 minute limit, we've decided to forge ahead with a new podcast dedicated to our strictly (well, mostly) non-movie related opinions, with a different though-provoking, teeth-grinding theme (or two) every episode. Politics, breaking news, pop culture... whatever happens to be on our minds when we start recording. There is no main agenda, other than to discuss these news items and events that instill within us a growing alienation from what we might have thought of at one point as the rational world. We're also hoping to drag a variety of guest hosts into the mix to help spread the madness and add to the voices in your head.
We're looking forward to entertaining you with our thoughts on a variety of topics, and hope you find the time to listen, suggest topics, or even join in yourselves. Because as the man once said, we're all in it together.
We've been hosting a movie review podcast for over two years now called Moviesucktastic. Noticing one night that we spend an inordinate amount of time discussing bad movies, we decided to start recording these conversation, adding a pinch of production value here and there, and releasing these film-based rants as a podcast series. It's been a lot of fun, and with our 100th episode rounding the corner by the end of this year, we don't plan on stopping anytime soon.
But lately, in between bad movies and late-night recording sessions, a new thought has occurred to us.
We don't just talk about movies.
And so a new podcast is born. With an eye on keeping episode times down to a 30 to 60 minute limit, we've decided to forge ahead with a new podcast dedicated to our strictly (well, mostly) non-movie related opinions, with a different though-provoking, teeth-grinding theme (or two) every episode. Politics, breaking news, pop culture... whatever happens to be on our minds when we start recording. There is no main agenda, other than to discuss these news items and events that instill within us a growing alienation from what we might have thought of at one point as the rational world. We're also hoping to drag a variety of guest hosts into the mix to help spread the madness and add to the voices in your head.
We're looking forward to entertaining you with our thoughts on a variety of topics, and hope you find the time to listen, suggest topics, or even join in yourselves. Because as the man once said, we're all in it together.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)